the diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day
The two maps give information about the change in the layout of Ashford between 1965 and the current structure.
In general, the layout of Ashford has significantly changed, with additional features and the loss of several areas. It can be seen that it has changed from a small town to an urbanized area.
In the north of Ashford, the enormous forest has been destructed to make way for a new parking lot next to the river bank. In 1965, there are few houses in the town, but various houses and apartments have been constructed recently. A new car park in the residential area connects a small path to Road Bridge.
In the south, the river has reduced in size, and various houses have been built across the river bank. It can be seen that there is a significant change in the transported infrastructures. People had to use the ferry to travel to the other side of the river in the past. In contrast, Road Bridge has been erected to connect with the city and is parallel to the footbridge now. Finally, two car parks have been built.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | maiphuonganh | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 56
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both views and give your opinion Sample TED 56
- Some people think the qualities a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 100
- 01 08 2015 The world natural resorces are being consumed at an ever increased rate What are the dangers of this situation What should we do 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54010695187 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56126845237 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550802139037 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.191976384 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.1818181818 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0600524657282 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0231425111999 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333917236305 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0473284739276 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03649667866 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.