The diagram below shows how instant noodless are manufactured
The diaagram below indicates how instant noodless are manufactured.
The diagram explains how instant noodless are produced. First flour is brought in storage silos and transferred to mixer. Water and oil filled on top of the flour in mixer. All things are mixed. After mixing it becomes a dough. The dough is passed through rollers. The dough is spindled by rollers. Next step is cut the dough and shaped. When it is ready, noodless is put in round discs. Then noddless discs are thrown the cooking process for cooking in oil. The cooked noodless are dried by boiling. Next vegetables and spices are taken. This ingredients stuffed in cups for to be delicious. Labels are received and affixed to the cups. The seal will contain the composition and shelf life of the noodless. Finally ugras are packed. Product was ready.
It was a clear view of the fast cooking production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- Writing Task 1 The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 11
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it 67
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 61
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e flour in mixer. All things are mixed. After mixing it becomes a dough. The dough is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
.... Next vegetables and spices are taken. This ingredients stuffed in cups for to be d...
^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...osition and shelf life of the noodless. Finally ugras are packed. Product was ready. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46324988582 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 7.0 22.4926829268 31% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.4833482174 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 38.3684210526 112.824112599 34% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 7.89473684211 22.9334400587 34% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.26315789474 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217461759038 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590332257566 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130457669316 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182507784654 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166692860241 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.4 13.2329268293 41% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.29 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.7 10.3012195122 36% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 3.5 11.4329268293 31% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 4.8 10.9970731707 44% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 4.0 11.0658536585 36% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e flour in mixer. All things are mixed. After mixing it becomes a dough. The dough is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
.... Next vegetables and spices are taken. This ingredients stuffed in cups for to be d...
^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...osition and shelf life of the noodless. Finally ugras are packed. Product was ready. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46324988582 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 7.0 22.4926829268 31% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.4833482174 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 38.3684210526 112.824112599 34% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 7.89473684211 22.9334400587 34% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.26315789474 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217461759038 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590332257566 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130457669316 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182507784654 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166692860241 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.4 13.2329268293 41% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.29 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.7 10.3012195122 36% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 3.5 11.4329268293 31% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 4.8 10.9970731707 44% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 4.0 11.0658536585 36% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.