The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates the process of producing sugar from sugar canes. Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that there are 6 stages in the process, beginning with the harvest of sugar canes, and ending with the product of sugar.
At the first stage, sugar canes have been grown for one year or one year and a half, before being qualified to be reaped. There are two ways to harvest sugar canes, by using machines to collect in large or gathering mature plants by hand. In the next stage, yield trees are put in the grinder and crushed, which results in the outcome is raw sugar cane juice.
After that, the juice of sugar cane is run through a limestone filter to get rid of the particles. Then, through the process of heating, the juice is evaporated and becomes a syrup. In the following step, the syrup goes through the centrifuge process which detaches sugar crystal from the syrup. Finally, the solid sugar is made after cooling and drying the crystal of sugar.
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 85
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 42
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ooling and drying the crystal of sugar.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68965517241 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26404688781 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6955065954 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261055258619 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119961688737 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717219707073 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181200777033 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493068154348 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.