The given bar chart depicts the information about the share of all world production by various nation between 1840 and 2000. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
Looking at overall, it shows the highest figure for Asia and Europe and on the contrary side the rest of the world by far the lowest figure in a given period.
Commencing with the ratio of share world production in Asia and Europe was 50% and 40%, respectively. Similarly, the lowest data dramatically in the rest of the world than others in 1840. However, the ratio of sharing in Europe was 45%, wears in the rest of the world has 15% less in 1880. In addition, the proportion of all world production in Europe was 45% as against the rest of the world as well as Asia showed the lowest figure, which is collected at 20% and 32%.
Furthermore, the percentage of global production by Europe and the rest of the world was analogue, which is accounted for 35% in 1920. Likewise, In Asia was a decline in a given period. The varied significantly difference in Asia and Europe, the former has 39% and the latter has 28%. The rest of world production was data collected at 32% in 2000.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed if they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others however believe that is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph below shows the sales of children s books adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country 93
- The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014 88
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of all world production in Europe was 45% as against the rest of the world as ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, similarly, well, in addition, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57211538462 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56825735101 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447115384615 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2537000594 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280290022065 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119073583294 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645910098798 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176809873625 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486241550726 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.