The bar chart illustrates the amount of time spent watching television by different age groups and gender in the United Kingdom during two years, 1995 and 1999. Overall, there was a decrease in the average number of hours spent watching TV between 1995 and 1999 across all groups except for individuals aged 65 and above.
In 1995, individuals aged 65 and above watched an average of almost 32 hours per week, which increased to over 35 hours in 1999. Similarly, those aged 55-64 watched over 26 hours per week in 1995, but this decreased to around 23 hours in 1999. Conversely, those in the 16-24 age group spent the least amount of time watching TV in both years at approximately 17.5 hours per week.
Looking at gender differences, in 1995, males across all age groups watched more TV than females; however, by 1999, females had caught up or surpassed males in some age groups. For example, in the 25-34 age group, males watched over 26 hours per week in 1995, but this decreased to just under 23 hours in 1999, while females' TV-watching time remained stable at around 22 hours per week.
It is also notable that the decrease in TV-watching time was slightly greater for males than females between 1995 and 1999. While both genders experienced a decline in the amount of time spent watching TV in every age group, the percentage decrease was generally higher for males.
In conclusion, the bar chart provides a clear overview of the changes in time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK between 1995 and 1999. Despite some gender differences, the overall trend was a decrease in TV-watching time across all age groups except for those aged 65 and above.
- Now look at five categories related to the result of a questionnaire regarding how you typically feel about the causes of global warming Then write a 150 word essay 78
- The chart below gives information about the amount of time children spend with their parents 77
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 73
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, look, similarly, so, while, except for, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76288659794 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43271786782 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432989690722 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5698686312 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287255286753 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163192584248 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536507925456 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21658359264 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487454250147 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.