The diagram demonstrates how West Park Secondary School has improved over a period of 60 years since its establishment in 1950. Overall, It can be seen clearly that the school had suffered significantly related to the space, the expansion of the school building, as well as the addition of a sports field and car park.
In 1950, the school had one building just right next to the series of houses. There was also a playground immediately behind the school and farmland located south-west of it. However, in 1980, the houses were demolished to build a car park. Moreover, the building was expanded into two parts, which are called the science block, car building and the main building.
About 30 years from 1980 to 2010, the most significant alteration to the school was the size of the playground, which had been reduced to make room for a new sports field, while the car park expanded. The school building remained the same place as before.
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars Give reasons 73
- Newspapers are less important nowadays because we have up to date access to the news on the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... building, as well as the addition of a sports field and car park. In 1950, the sc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84049079755 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59912810333 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3152024258 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235526785116 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111139500035 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991206060267 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164880441542 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849695034026 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.