The diagram shows process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to landfill
The flowchart presents 2 ways to deal with plastic items, either throwing into landfill or recycling.
On the whole, it is clear that reprocess is more complex way to handle these items.
To begin with the first method of discarding them into the landfill which experiences three steps with the output of trash. The first phase is products displayed for sales. The process continues with buying and using plastics items for domestic purposes. In the end they are transformed to the landfill from waste bin or littering.
On the other hand, recycling seems like a circulation. After buying and using them, plastic items are carried to a recycling collection point and then they are classified in a warehouse sorting. Following this stage, they are loaded on the trucks to be transported to the facilities where they are processed before becoming the new products and then starting a new circulation
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-05 | Trang Carina | 74 | view |
- The table shows the percentage of pupils who entered higher education from 5 secondary schools between 1995 and 2000 inclusive 78
- Some people think that nuclear is better than other source of power for meeting ever increasing global needs To what extent do you agree 92
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 56
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 78
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, on the whole, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06040268456 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65587014595 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637583892617 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3267518352 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7777777778 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229829243747 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833678911482 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615369382518 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117976897787 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756101227978 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.