The diagram shows the proposed changes to Foster Road.
Write a 150-word report describing the proposed changes for a local committee.
The given maps compare the suggested future outlook of the Foster road situated between southeast 84th and 85th avenue with the present scenario.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the futuristic plan is highly constructive, spacious, safe, and environment friendly.
According to the given illustration, although the present plan has wider roads to manage huge traffic, it lacks pedestrian's safety and environment cleanliness. In contrast, the proposed plan is composed of a proper balance between safety and cleanliness.
As is given on the map, there is a plan to plant a significant number of trees on both sides of the road to initiate mitigation of increased pollution. In addition, a zebra crossing is going to be installed down the road at the intersection point, which will provide extra safety from the accidents. This crossing will include an island in the middle, where people can stand safely to wait. Further, there is a proposed suggestion to widen up the sidewalks on opposite sides of the road, keeping in view the safety of the people using available amenities. The far end lanes of the road will be assigned only for the use of cyclists.
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012 92
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 92
- In some countries owning a house rather than renting is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 78
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 84
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12244897959 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84774328476 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9714378705 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105279430212 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438321102498 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324579597245 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533025451048 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327962856514 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.