The given bar graph illustrates the relevant data on proportion of landline telephone holders surveyed behind every 1000 people in nine different countries over a period of five years from 2000 to 2004.
In the overall trend, it is evident that highest number of landline phones are possessed by people in Singapore as compared to other countries, where a continuous decline pattern can be witnessed, with a least number in Myanmar and Lao PDR.
Getting back to details, more than 430 people preferred this ownership in Singapore with a very little difference across given years. However, the highest bar reaches to 450 in 2000. Following next, Brunei Darussalam having nearly half of total proportion as seen in Singapore, very close to 250 owners during the given years.
In contrary, the least trend can be seen in Myanmar and Lao PDR, where landline ownership falls below 10 as against every 1000 people. Many other countries including Cambodia, Indonesia and Vietnam falls even below the less ownership countries like Philippines and Thailand with four times less ratio as of Singapore approaching close to 90.
- The chart below give information about levels of education in Glasgow a city in Scotland in 2010 89
- The maps show the change in Pentland from 1980 to 2007 72
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The diagram explains the production of chocolate 11
- The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...Singapore as compared to other countries , where a continuous decline pattern can ...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...nuous decline pattern can be witnessed, with least number in Myanmar and Lao PDR. Getti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2044198895 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56755131753 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640883977901 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.951380867 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191078863842 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789783530294 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698013073399 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118211618521 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663026759293 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.