The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket
The given map details the plan of constructing a supermarket in two possible locations in the town of Garlsdon.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that while one of the sites is proposed in the town-center, the other possibility lies in the country-side.
According to the given illustration, the Garlsdon town with population size 65 000 lies in the middle of the map with two industrial units to the north and its opposite end. The first proposal is planned in the middle of the town center, located in the center of the main town. Also, this site will be approachable to the town of Brandson(population 15000, 16 km to the south-west of the town center), and Cranston(with a double population, 25 km to either end of the Brandson) through the main road connectivity.
Furthermore, this site will be nearly 12 km far from the Hindston town(population 10 000), connected via railway track, and extended further to join the Cranston town. However, the other site location is proposed to be constructed in the countryside surrounding the Grandson town to its north-west end,
which will be comparatively away from the town center.
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 73
- Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little can be done to rectify this To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1972 and 2001 56
- 82
- A chart on the average annual expenditures on a cell phone and residential phone services 2001 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he sites is proposed in the town-center, the other possibility lies in the countr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01554404145 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20004295388 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554404145078 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1468252055 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297262699687 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166546306147 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122860493771 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193542874404 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140725308659 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.