The given line graph compares the rate of emission of carbon dioxide released per person measured in Metric tonnes in four countries (the United kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) over a period of 40 years from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that the maximum amount of carbon dioxide is emitted in the United kingdom as compared to Italy and Portugal, where a steady increase can be witnessed in later years. However, Sweden observed a sharp fall in emission rate after attaining its peak value.
Getting back to details, more than 10 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide was released by a person in United Kingdom in 1967. After that it observed a steady decline by nearly 2 metric tonnes. On the other hand, in Sweden almost 8.5 metric tonnes emerged out in 1967 that later rose to its peak value of 11 metric tonnes in 1977.But in later years, it plummeted to half of its highest value approaching to just 5 on the measuring scale in 2007.
Almost 5 metric tonnes of gas released in Italy as against only 1 metric tonnes in Portugal in 1967. Thereafter, both marked a dramatic rise reaching to peak values nearly 7 and 5 metric tonnes in 1997. After which, both maintained a constant behaviour, with Italy remained higher by 2 metric tonnes in comparison to Portugal.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment 84
- The diagrams below illustrate the early tools from 1 4 million years ago and 800 000 years ago Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050 73
- The table below shows the results of a 25 year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... by a person in United Kingdom in 1967. After that it observed a steady decline by ne...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... peak value of 11 metric tonnes in 1977.But in later years, it plummeted to half of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70222222222 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40301867771 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528888888889 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4993726757 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185787175725 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835189881968 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793857004225 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138498728995 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816336202835 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.