The picture given illustrates a rainwater harvesting method used in Australian town making them safe to drink and distribute to the same houses where they are being collected from.
Generally, this technology can be divided into four main parts which can explain the total process. It starts from collecting through drains and ends up supplying drinking water through a separate pipeline.
During the rain, water is being collected on the roof top, passed through drain pipes of each house and are ultimately met at a common drain pipe. Then they are cleaned under a water filter and then passed to a storage tank where screening, sedimentation and other related processes are done. Stored water are then collected over a water treatment plant, where they are oxidized and necessary minerals are added to make it potable.
In the treatment plant, chemicals like bleaching powder, etc are added at a section which are part of chemical treatment. The treated water is now allowed through pipes and distributed to all the residents from where these rain waters are collected. The drain pipe of rainwater and delivery pipe of drinking water are well separated by different pipes making sure they never mix for safe consumption.
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots why do you think it is happening Is it negative or positive development 56
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The graph below shows the information about languages 13 year old students in one school choose to study 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13432835821 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56253197724 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2761203335 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226277109651 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092611825319 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755723456737 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145179524151 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632492665338 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.