The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery.
The first picture shows the layout of an art gallery, and the second shows some proposed changes to the gallery space.
It is clear that significant changes will be made in terms of the use of floor space in the gallery. There will be a completely new entrance and more space for exhibitions.
At present, visitors enter the gallery through doors which lead into a lobby. However, the plan is to move the entrance to the Parkinson Court side of the building, and visitors will walk straight into the exhibition area. In place of the lobby and office areas, which are shown on the existing plan, the new gallery plan shows an education area and a small storage area.
The permanent exhibition space in the redeveloped gallery will be about twice as large as it is now because it will occupy the area that is now used for temporary exhibitions. There will also be a new room for special exhibitions. This room is shown in red on the existing plan and is not currently part of the gallery.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | dangcongkhai10082005 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | Zayniddin17 | 44 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | thienhanguyen | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | thienhanguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | thienhanguyen | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 56
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59550561798 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45448403073 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516853932584 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2883794382 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24618816549 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933734391961 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559703470524 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137314097677 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438853614154 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.