The diagrams below demonstrate broadband users per 1000 inhabitants in different countries from 2002 and 2003 and the growth of broadband subscriber in these countries in the same period

Essay topics:

The diagrams below demonstrate broadband users per 1000 inhabitants in different countries from 2002 and 2003 and the growth of broadband subscriber in these countries in the same period

Two charts illustrate the information on the percentage of broad users and the increasing of subscribers in different countries between 2002 and 2003.
Overall, it is clear that Korean users took up the largest rate, whereas its counterpart in the UK was less preferable in bar chart. However, the figure for broadband subscribers had a downward trend in five nations at first half 2002 and 2003, except for Germany.
As can be seen from the bar chart, there was an upward trend for using broadband service in all countries. Korean people was a major contributor to the number of broadband usage, just under 20% of users in 2002 and nearly a quarter of users in 2003. The proportion of American individuals was at the second position for using broadband service in 2002 with just under 10%, while the figure for Japan were more preferable for this service than the other country (except for Korean) about 5%. The UK had less interest in applying broadband technology in their life with the lowest rate in five countries.
On the other hand, The UK and the Japan constituted for the highest rate about growth of broadband subscriber in the first half 2002, 77% and 112% respectively. Although there was a significant decline in using this service, however, they still remained the major contributor, 59% in Britain and 40% in Japan in 2003. Whereas the figure for Germany had an upward trend of using broadband network from 16% to 29%

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-06-04 naixaxa 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...002 and 2003. Overall, it is clear that Korean users took up the largest rate, w...
^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in five countries. On the other hand, The UK and the Japan constituted for the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, still, whereas, while, except for, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59770092629 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3365360981 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232300378287 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105163023689 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636695244976 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166676307739 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047054821024 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.