The given pie chart demonstrates the percentage of four different manners of transportation in Edmonton and the table below denotes the proportion of purpose of using the cars in city.
On the whole, as can be seen in the pie chart, the utilization of the cars for transport accounts for the maximal proportion among the whole. Moreover, according to the table, the majority of people use the car for commuting to work.
Turning to the detail, nearly half of the citizens in Edmonton travel by the car, as opposed to the use of the LRT, which comprises of 35%. The statistic of people taking the bus is on par with that of the taxi, making up 10%.
With regard to the table, over 50% of people utilize the car to commute to work, followed by the driving it for business purpose, which takes up 45%. The most striking point is the minimal figure falls into the category of shopping, and this number is equivalent to that of leisure activities, standing at 15%.
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 34
- Unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example, working for a charity, improving the neighborhood, or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- people should be allowed to work as long as they want to, and not be forced to retire at a particular age such as 60 or 65.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups.Describe the information shown to a university or collage lecturer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...as opposed to the use of the LRT, which comprises of 35%. The statistic of people taking th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the use of the LRT, which comprises of 35%. The statistic of people taking the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, on the whole, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63372093023 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54528349911 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9823700588 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138241367611 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639382101387 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474708650449 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890331937853 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480222482703 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.