The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table and graph provide information about the means of transportation and the reasons for people using cars in Edmonton. Overall, it is readily apparent that the majority of people in Edmonton transport using cars and a large number of people use these vehicles for commuting to the workplace.
To begin with, as many as 45% of Edmonton citizens travel using cars, and commuting with Light Right Transit (LRT) ranks second with 35% of people using this transportation method. Additionally, the least favorable means of transportation are bus and taxi, with only 10% of Edmonton commuters using each transportation method.
Moving to the table, more than half of people drive their cars to travel to workplaces, and going for business at just below 5% that of travel to workplace, followed by dropping children to school (40%). Driving a car to go shopping and leisure activities are only done by 15% of commuters, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-06 | Wardiati Yusuf | 70 | view |
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 67
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 73
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting while but many others think it is very boring In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children 95
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- the graph below illustrates internet users as percentage of population in the countries usa canada and mexico between 1999 to 2009 67
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 153 200
No. of Characters: 752 1000
No. of Different Words: 90 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.517 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.915 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.86 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 51 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.652 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.167 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.5 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.5 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.126 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4