The maps depict the transformation in the construction of a hospital which is called “Queen Mary” in three years, 1960, 1980 and 2000. It is clear that after 40 years, the hospital was changed from rural area to moderned hospital.
Looking at the north side of three diagrams, the shopping center was demolished to make way for the cancer centre and the pharmacy, with the hospital being remained unchanged. The erection of the cancer centre was necessary for hospital purposes.
The south side of the diagrams have significant changes through 40 years. In 1960, there was a farmland which was colored in green in the first map was cleared to construct nursing school in 1980. However, the nursing school was dimished to make way for the expansion of the cancer centre. Last but not least, the most noticeable point of the diagrams is the construction of the car park of Queen Mary Hospital. While from 1960 to 1980, the size and the location of the car park remained stable, in the next 20 years, that parking was shrunk a half in size in order to make way for the nursing school.
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 73
- Full time university students spend most of the time in studying They should do other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Many developed countries now have large numbers of people over the age of 65 What problems might this cause How can the problems be solved 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7277486911 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47487304191 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7634983681 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186792862569 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905231170648 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680164506641 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13485578329 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055080647657 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7277486911 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47487304191 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7634983681 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186792862569 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905231170648 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680164506641 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13485578329 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055080647657 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.