The provided three maps illustrate how West Park secondary school was developed from 1950 when it was built to 2010.
Overall, the most noticeable change that happened in the school is the construction of car park. However, a striking point was the houses and farmland had completely disappeared by 2010.
At the first glance, the school is quite small and located in the south of the main road. Although there were few of residential houses situated in the northwest corner in 1950, they were demolished in the year 1980 for building car park and science block. The farmland in the southwest of the map was also replaced to make sports field, while there was a maintenance of playground.
In the 1980-2010 period, car park was expanded dramatically whereas the sports field became smaller. Meanwhile, the playground was considerably narrowed in comparison with the previous period.
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefi 61
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16551724138 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74340632065 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648275862069 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.819347292 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.625 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14355572621 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653114766347 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528117344302 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910766182113 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318149340215 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.