The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate how simple equipment used for cooking purposes has developed over many years in the past.
Overall, the development process involves three main stages, with the later versions being more convenient and complicated than the previous ones.
Taking a close look at picture A, the first cooking equipment version was simple, which was a large pottery pot with narrow mouth put on a piece of stone. Looking at the following stage in picture B, cooking equipment is developed into a clay shield with large round mouth on which human put a pot including food to cook.
In the following stage of advancement depicted in picture C, cooking equipment is made of metal with two layers. The upper one is a clay lining which includes a grate for charcoal to provide heat, three supports for pot and a handle. The ground layer has a door through which air flows inside and ash is pushed out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-03-13 | namviet | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Medical services should be run by profit making companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is better for students at university to live far away from home than to live at home with their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Many young people leave school with negative attitudes towards learning Why What can be done to encourage a positive attitude to learning in young people 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'flows'' or 'flow's'?
Suggestion: flows'; flow's
...ound layer has a door through which air flows inside and ash is pushed out.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8141025641 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43139766571 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2441718164 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16377935576 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794827834718 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661928268481 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104656123221 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529657715266 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.