The diagrams below show UK students responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

What is demonstrated in the given diagrams is the information pertaining to managing finances by UK students via answer to the survey.

Overall, most of the responses received are rated as fairly organised. Additionally, the more managing finance is really organised, the higher age group presented.

Looking at the statistic in further details, quite organised economic management dominated the pie chart. Specifically, 55% of answers are considered as fairly organised. With regards to very and not very organised comment, around roughly a quarter of answers is estimated in those groups. Lastly, a mere minority of 4% accounted for almost unorganised management in economy.

Turning to the remaining figure, the organisation seems to be improved throughout the seniority. Obviously, 18% of students aged up to 22 are rated as very organised. Continuously, the age group of 23 to 25 year-old achieved the proportion of 26% people who are extremely organised. Last but not least, the highest data is seen on the age of over 26 year-old with 35%. Totally, 21% of students succeeded on managing finances.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, look, really

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37142857143 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08187062198 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645714285714 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9605640175 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3333333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846992677187 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312599783636 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04365689872 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642815760811 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580074965522 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.