The photos illustrate data about the transformation in a student’s residence over the years.
From a quick glance at the maps, it could be seen that the student’s area underwent fundamental changes in structures. While several pieces of infrastructures were modernized, removed, or translocated, others still remained almost unchanged during the period time.
To begin with, some parts of the area maintain the same condition as initially. To the west of the maps, it is clear that not only the two student’s bedrooms sited at the bottom and top but also the kitchen in the middle part has stayed in the same location. Especially, the bathroom was continued to lie at the center of the accommodation along with another student-Bedroom located right on the left side. Moreover, the main entrance and hallway which almost unchanged were situated in close proximity to the sleeping room.
On the other hand, the other structures witnessed significant expansion, conversion, and replacement. When we looking at the southern of this area, the garden was completely reconstructed with the parking lot. Furthermore, the hallway that extended result in the En-suite room was disappeared at the end of the corridor. Meanwhile, to the north of the student’s residence, there are two advanced student-bedroom that replaced the living room and a small piece of garden. Ultimately, the green garden is added and reshaped into a new straight-from above the sleeping areas.
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 content com android chrome FileProvider images screenshot 16321376288372007373030 jpg 11
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...which almost unchanged were situated in close proximity to the sleeping room. On the other ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32618025751 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14411004694 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630901287554 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7788888667 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.416666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128102096163 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430798359594 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549576146241 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860741382708 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366992011893 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.