The diagrams give information about changes in a student's accommodation.
The given diagrams depict the layout of the students' department between 2010 and the present.
Overall, this block has undergone a number of dramatic transformations. The most noticeable changes are the increase in the number of study-bedroom as well as the integration of parking lot
In 2010, the building was cultivated by the garden from South to North. However, at the present, the Southern garden has been demolished to make room for a parking area. On the North-West, there used to be a vacant land in which a study-bedroom, then, has been constructed. The living room has been torn down and replaced by another study - bedroom.
In the apartment center, the bathroom and hall have been slightly reduced in size in order to leave space for the kitchen and ensuite bathroom. The kitchen remains unchanged but includes a social area while the ensuite bathroom has been built adjacent to the hall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian people who were born in different places of the world 78
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects 61
- The plans below show a student accommodation buildings 2010 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The two maps below show Paradise island from the past until now 73
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...given diagrams depict the layout of the students department between 2010 and the present...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98675496689 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82829704888 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7831483155 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0515104526071 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024001240573 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484759592228 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0477029457387 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595743715462 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.