The diagrams show changes in a student common room

Essay topics:

The diagrams show changes in a student common room.

The two maps illustrate the view of a student common five years ago and at present.
Overall, it is clear that the community room has overcome a significant transformation with the installation of new facilities.
Five years ago, the room contained four circle tables with each surrounded by six chairs. There were two benches on the right-hand side of the room. On the right of these benches were a sink and a cupboard, while a fridge and a microwave were on the left.
So far, two previous tables have been demolished to make way for a greater rectangular table and a new bench for students using laptops. In addition, a microwave has replaced one bench and a drinks machine has been equipped to meet the needs of food and beverage consumption. Finally, three armchairs and a television have been installed on the bottom left-hand corner of the room for entertainment.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-26 tragn.nee 56 view
2021-11-01 KEVA view
Essays by user Đinh Toàn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two maps illustrate the view of a st...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... common five years ago and at present. Overall, it is clear that the community ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th the installation of new facilities. Five years ago, the room contained four ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idge and a microwave were on the left. So far, two previous tables have been de...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89041327303 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8281568506 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128375086352 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572832389985 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04316658426 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083232969121 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347461593963 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.