The diagrams show changes in a student common room.
The pictures illustrate the layout changes in a student common room from 5 years ago up until now.
Overall, it is clear that the student common room is now significantly different from that of 5 years ago, which meant a convert from a plain zone to a room with more amenities, such as self-served machine and entertainment-related gadgets.
Five years ago, there used to be two benches, but now one of which has been replaced with a microwave. Moreover, over the past 5 years, the number of circular tables has reduced from four to two and instead of using the same type of tables, there is a newly-added rectangular table with a bigger capacity of 8 people. Another difference can be noticed is that a bench for laptops has also been added to the south of the common room. In the southwest corner, the previous desk has been replaced with a combination of a television and three armchairs. Another addition can be seen is a vending machine for drinks, which the room 5 years ago didn’t include. However, the locations of some amenities including a sink, a cupboard and a refrigerator have remained unchanged for 5 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen or pencil What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or a negative development 67
- The diagram below describes the nitrogen cycle 61
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia in 2018 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73096446701 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93009064952 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.616222014 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179640855946 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828467163748 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104686160468 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179605847029 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100419663029 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.