Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.
Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Due to the advancement of technology, e-mail and telephone calls have dramatically replaced the position of face-to-face communication. However, some people still think that direct interaction is better than other types. Personally, I totally strike a blow for this notion.
To commence with, speaking to someone in person can make it much easier to motivate them. For instance, to encourage students to study harder for the final exam, teachers could make them rings or write letters to them but it seems to be more effective to walk to them, smile at them and stimulate them in person. In other words, face-to-face interaction enhances working productivity by creating more motivation.
In addition, direct communication is one of significant factors to build a true friendship. As a matter of fact, when people make friends with others by chance through e-mail or phone calls, maybe, at first, they will find it fabulous. However, in the long run, they will feel bored and the friendship can not last long. On the contrary, if people make friends by speaking directly, they will have more time to work and chat together. As a result, they are capable of understanding each other thoroughly, which is the foundation for a true comradeship to flourish and exist forever.
To sum up, in my opinion, face -to- face interaction is a better choice for people than other types so that people can have more stimulation as well as more close friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-24 | thuybeo25092002 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Health care should not be provided for free regardless of a person’s income. The health of a person is in their own hands and they should, therefore, be held accountable for that. Do you agree with this opinion? 84
- Talk about the importance of fresh water to life and offer your own solutions to preserve this very valuable natural resource. 61
- In many Western countries, there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children. What are the advantages and disadvantages to couples having no children? 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Due to the advancement of technology, e-...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tally strike a blow for this notion. To commence with, speaking to someone...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctivity by creating more motivation. In addition, direct communication is one...
^^^^
Line 6, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct, when people make friends with others by chance through e-mail or phone calls,...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ship to flourish and exist forever. To sum up, in my opinion, face -to- face...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, well, for instance, in addition, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04149377593 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85466322287 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618257261411 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7551207498 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.75 5.23603664747 282% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151025760182 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580470169176 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596993812994 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105353970481 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493270615243 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.