Expenditure on fast foods by income groups,UK 1990
The graph shows the fast foods consumption of UK inhabitants divided by income in 1990.
Overall, It is clear that the pizza was the food chosen most by both high income and average income groups while the figure for fish and chips was highest in the low income group in 1990.
First of all, the hamburger were nearly 40 and 32 for high earnings and average earnings group respectively. However this figure just was 14 in group of low income.
Secondly, the number of fish and chips was equal in both low and high salary groups, at 16. The category of average salary was also highest, at 25 to be exactly.
Finally, pizza is a kind of food was seemly opted by income. Because the high earnings group had highest number at 18, followed by the group of average income at 12 and the low salary group was lowest at 6.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | meoconxinhxan | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
- Expenditure on fast foods by income groups,UK 1990 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
The graph shows the fast foods consumption of UK inhabitants divided b...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ighest in the low income group in 1990. First of all, the hamburger were nearly ...
^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nd average earnings group respectively. However this figure just was 14 in group of low...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...income. Because the high earnings group had highest number at 18, followed by the group of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, while, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 667.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41721854305 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19114244509 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509933774834 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5639225166 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.375 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192081062322 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997827877644 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140687497004 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147153379891 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158465811383 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.