The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided table and pie chart give data on the number of five internet users in millions of people from the year 1995 to 2004 in five European countries. While the pie chart provides the precentage of online shopping users in 2004.
It is clear from the information provided in the table that the amount of internet users among five nations raised steadily and peaks at 2004. During these years, Britain had the largest number of online users followed by Germany. From a negligible 16 million in 1995, British online users increase to about 41 million in 2004. Meanwhile, German online users growth from 5 million in 1995 to 15 million in 2004. The lowest number of online users in Europe during this period are Spain which has only half of the million users in 1995, 700 thousand users in 2000 and 2 million users in 2004.
As for the proportion of 2004’s online shopping users among Europe nations provided on the pie chart, the majority of online shopping users was UK, by 47 percent. In other side, internet shopping
users in France become less popular, just about 5 percent. Although internet users in Spain were the lowest, yet Spain was the fourth most use online shopping at 8 percent
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 56 | view |
- Birth rate 56
- the internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades.Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of thistechnology has been positive. 78
- Two Planning Maps 11
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo ur own knowledge or experience 61
- People leaving rural areas 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...995 to 2004 in five European countries. While the pie chart provides the precentage o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...llion in 2004. Meanwhile, German online users growth from 5 million in 1995 to 15 mil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26072149501 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1579866696 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213453612542 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108760259032 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03175281975 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147362206413 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335551447261 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.