The first chart illustrates the average money spend on children's sports by British parents between 2008 and 2014. The second chart demonstrates the number of children participated in football, athletics and swimming in British over the same span of time. Generally, both the average monthly money spend on children's sports and the number of children participate in sports increased from 2008 to 2014.
In the first chart, the average monthly spend on children's sports was 20 pounds in 2008. Afterward, it increased steady in the following six years. It rised to 32 pounds in 2014.
In the second chart, both football and swimming increased gradually from 2008 to 2014. The number of children participated in football and swimming is 8 million and 2 million respectively. The number of children participated in athletics remain steady from 2008 to 2010, which showed a sharp increase from 2010 to 2012, and reached its peak of 5 million in 2012. It decreased gradually from 2012 to 2014. Overall, the three different sports, namely football, athletes and swimming, all increased in the number of children participation from 2008 to 2014.
- Some people think that excessive use of mobile phones and computers badly affects teenagers writing and reading skills Do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your opinion 91
- Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play until they are six or seven years old.Others believe that is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible.What do you think are the advantages of attending sc 56
- The chart below gives information about the UK's ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035. 56
- Some people say that teaching local history to school children is more important than teaching world history to them. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing task 1 The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 71
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'second']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231884057971 0.268076937826 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.0869565217391 0.116061578633 75% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0772946859903 0.0759168565197 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.024154589372 0.0366838410393 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0193236714976 0.0131127313244 147% => OK
Prepositions: 0.149758454106 0.155750635184 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0338164251208 0.0379272487307 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77403172454 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0338164251208 0.0210936926555 160% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0869565217391 0.0948980150116 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0048309178744 0.00967000014798 50% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1139.0 1161.00487805 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.9 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15675675676 5.90752243213 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405405405405 0.337110787985 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291891891892 0.247514529752 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216216216216 0.171178102325 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145945945946 0.112407865282 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77403172454 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448648648649 0.546246751206 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 36.5488082077 49.3433353143 74% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8181818182 23.0094962315 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7743654523 42.9750493124 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.545454545 135.714022679 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 23.0094962315 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.272727272727 0.689975730869 40% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 46.0073710074 47.7609492067 96% => OK
Elegance: 3.18518518519 2.94281807926 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.585698098898 0.418131533498 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.233242539345 0.181151798455 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.110023963239 0.0850326197045 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.639324911629 0.706616315825 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118094092813 0.157042692854 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.299940905763 0.228904883108 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164000157277 0.108899403657 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.382290357063 0.367819155151 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0702730117682 0.0812612215331 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.469608662999 0.316326947829 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152352408864 0.0921553760075 165% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.08536585366 98% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.02926829268 132% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.