The first diagram illustrates average energy use of an Australian household in different categories. While the second diagram depicts how these uses contribute to the green house emissions. The mentioned parameters are water heating, refrigeration, heating, cooling, lighting and other appliances.
It is clear from the chart that majority of Australia's household energy is used for heating purpose (42%), it's almost contribute to the half of the total power consumption. Water heating comes at second with 30% consumption. All other appliances together consumed only one third of the total energy, which accounts to refrigeration(7%), other appliances(15%), lighting(4%), cooling(2%) respectively.
On the flip side of the coin, the second chart shows a completely different proportions when it comes to green house emissions. It seems like appliances which consumed less energy contributed more to the green house gas emissions. Less energy appliances like refrigeration, other appliances and lighting almost accounted for two fold emission figures as compared to it's consumption percentages. The important point to be noted that, although heating is responsible for most of the energy use, it only emits less amount of hazardous gas (15%). Cooling and lighting together accounted for merely 5% of total emissions.
In conclusion, Australians consumed most of the energy for heating purposes. Whereas, green house emissions are high in the case of least power consuming appliances.
- It is important to construct common areas such as parks, playgrounds and squares in all towns and cities. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The climate graph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 67
- some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Writing Task 2 (an essay)Some people are convinced that mature age employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lian household in different categories. While the second diagram depicts how these us...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...energy is used for heating purpose 42%, its almost contribute to the half of the to...
^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ost of the energy for heating purposes. Whereas, green house emissions are high in the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the least'.
Suggestion: of the least
...en house emissions are high in the case of least power consuming appliances.
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of least power consuming appliances.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, third, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71040723982 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10631424393 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556561085973 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.369259271 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0769230769 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243888220779 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881317381422 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776559652518 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145047374349 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473050804104 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.