The graph illustrates, the intake of four non vegetable items includes(chicken, beef, lamb, and fish)in europian country for 25 consequtive years from 1979 to 2004. Overall, consumption of chicken increse and other items are declining.
From this, it is clear that consumption of chicken was only around 140 grams per week. But it became 2004, it became more than 250 grams. So most of the people are interested to eat chicken in the current world compared to other non vegetable items. When we move on to fish there is no much variation. Stil it reduces from 60 to 50 grams. But less number of people are interested to take fish.
In my view, beaf and lamb usage are declining from 1979. But both are higher than the intake of fish. Overall consumption of nonvegetable items are reducing.
To sum up, it is considered that, veriety of chicken preparation caused the dramatic increment in the business of chicken and that made it popular. World wide marketing improved.
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999. 11
- Some people think that travel is necessary to learn about other nations, others, however think that tv and internet is best way to learn discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The spread of multinational companies and the resulting increase of globalization produce positive effects to everyone Do you agree or disagree 82
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
Essay evaluation report
Overall, consumption of chicken increse and other items are declining.
Overall, the consumption of chicken increases and other items are declining.
it is clear that consumption of chicken
it is clear that the consumption of chicken
But it became 2004, it became more than 250 grams.
But in 2004, it became more than 250 grams.
Overall consumption of nonvegetable items are reducing.
Overall the consumption of nonvegetable items are reducing.
Sentence: The graph illustrates, the intake of four non vegetable items includeschicken, beef, lamb, and fishin europian country for 25 consequtive years from 1979 to 2004.
Error: consequtive Suggestion: consecutive
Error: fishin Suggestion: fishing
Error: includeschicken Suggestion: include chicken
Error: europian Suggestion: european
Sentence: Overall, consumption of chicken increse and other items are declining.
Error: increse Suggestion: increase
Sentence: In my view, beaf and lamb usage are declining from 1979.
Error: beaf Suggestion: beef
Sentence: To sum up, it is considered that, veriety of chicken preparation caused the dramatic increment in the business of chicken and that made it popular.
Error: veriety Suggestion: variety
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
You have big issue on task I, read this thread:
http://www.testbig.com/forum/best-strategy-practice-ielts-writing-task-i
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 13 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 776 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.675 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.616 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.769 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.435 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.335 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.543 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms. So most of the people are interested to eat chicken in the current world comp...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... compared to other non vegetable items. When we move on to fish there is no much var...
^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...items. When we move on to fish there is no much variation. Stil it reduces from 60...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Worldwide
...ss of chicken and that made it popular. World wide marketing improved.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: Worldwide
...ss of chicken and that made it popular. World wide marketing improved.
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'so', 'in my view', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.21164021164 0.268076937826 79% => OK
Verbs: 0.153439153439 0.116061578633 132% => OK
Adjectives: 0.126984126984 0.0759168565197 167% => OK
Adverbs: 0.021164021164 0.0366838410393 58% => OK
Pronouns: 0.042328042328 0.0131127313244 323% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126984126984 0.155750635184 82% => OK
Participles: 0.037037037037 0.0379272487307 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70119434023 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.037037037037 0.0210936926555 176% => OK
Particles: 0.00529100529101 0.00175180941692 302% => OK
Determiners: 0.0529100529101 0.0948980150116 56% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00529100529101 0.00967000014798 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 974.0 1161.00487805 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.9 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86746987952 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.307228915663 0.337110787985 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.222891566265 0.247514529752 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156626506024 0.171178102325 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120481927711 0.112407865282 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70119434023 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.546246751206 115% => OK
Word variations: 58.4053529508 49.3433353143 118% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 8.93414634146 146% => OK
Sentence length: 12.7692307692 23.0094962315 55% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3263315682 42.9750493124 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9230769231 135.714022679 55% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.7692307692 23.0094962315 55% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.307692307692 0.689975730869 45% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.48048780488 338% => OK
Readability: 35.0583873957 47.7609492067 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.73170731707 2.94281807926 59% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302467428728 0.418131533498 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0674015252821 0.181151798455 37% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0477179262504 0.0850326197045 56% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.509720435364 0.706616315825 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175056190987 0.157042692854 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110580699302 0.228904883108 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936512358822 0.108899403657 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.193237431821 0.367819155151 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0496115660597 0.0812612215331 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228332951595 0.316326947829 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764771178812 0.0921553760075 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.08536585366 171% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.