The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given pie charts illustrate the proportion of the exhaust of greenhouse which was emitted from using energy in the household of Australia.
Overall, it can be seen that the majority of energy utilized to heat, whereas the amount of gas emission from water heating was the highest.
In detail, the most energy used for heating brought in 42%, while this rate fell by nearly one third in the emitting the exhaust, around 15%. In addition, the energy use, provided most both of the water heating and cooling, at 30% and 2%, respectively. Similarly, with regard to the result of using this energy, it accounted for 32% and 3%, respectively.
On the other hand, the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions from the lighting, refrigeration and the other appliances nearly doubled in using this energy. From 4% to 8% with lighting, from 7% to 14% with refrigeration and from 15% to 28% with other appliances, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-18 | Rahul rathi | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The graph below shows the number of students from four different countries enrolled at Avago Language School in Sydney.Between 1990 and 2000 the composition of the student body changed and the Asian economic crisis seriously affected the overall number of 78
- The chart shows the number of students in the UK universities who completed (on time or late) failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010. 84
- The percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited different attractions 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, third, whereas, while, in addition, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7946365462 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.9499878843 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260923174344 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126094182041 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598704775597 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160429042011 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058696807895 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.