The given bar chart gives information about the different types of transport that travellers commuted to work in one European city between 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the percentage of cyclists and pedestrian saw a downward trend throughout the given period. Meanwhile, the proportion of commuters who used car increased sharply from the lowest point in 1960 to the highest point at the end of the period.
In 1960, a majority of people walked to work, at under 35%, followed by bike with 25%. The figure for pedestrians dropped less than 10% in 2020. Similarly, the proportion of cyclists saw a significant decline, above 5% and bike was the least common means of transport in the end.
On the other hand, buses and cars witnessed different trends in their data. In 1960, the percentage of bus users was under 20%, 4 times as much as cars. 20 years later, the proportion of commuters who travelled by bus grew more than 20%, then dropped at 17% in 2000. Whereas, the figure for drivers saw a dramatic rise to more than 35%, surpassed bus and car became the most prevalent option in 2020.
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74345549738 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52939734643 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591623036649 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6081278211 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254733214169 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892475753624 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14352190654 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181946068144 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186678998701 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.