The following graph shows the production of electricity according to source in France between 1985 and 2000.
The line graph given compares four main types of electricity production in France over a fifteen-year period, starting in 1985 and ending in 2000.
In 1985, the data shows that although thermal and hydroelectric were the popular sources of electricity production with 10 TWh and 80 TWh, respectively, from then on, they were on the decline. For thermal, it dropped sharply to 60 TWh in 1990 and remained unchanged until the end of the period. Similarly, hydroelectric decreased gradually throughout the period to a low of 50 TWh in 2000.
On the other hand, despite starting at 60 TWh in 1985, nuclear sources increase dramatically to 150 TWh in 1990, and from that point, there was a skyrocketing to the highest at 400 TWh. Although renewable sources of energy were barely registered for the first half of the period, then it rose gradually to 10TWh in 2000.
In general, it is clear in the graph that nuclear was the most popular source of electricity in France, while renewables did show signs of initial growth. Meanwhile, there was a slight decrease in thermal and hydroelectricity electricity production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-26 | leuyen0805 | 78 | view |
- The following graph shows the production of electricity according to source in France between 1985 and 2000 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in Australia in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevantFamily type 56
- Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV há bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted on the media. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows average obesity rates in the USA according to gender from 2000 to 2008 100
- The graph below shows average obesity rates in the USA according to gender from 2000 to 2008
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02150537634 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98531883888 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6395419633 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256381148079 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118507382341 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878760879 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168940126784 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667570232205 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.