The following pie-chart shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two different years.
The pie charts illustrate the comparison of energy production from gas, coal, petrol, nuclear and other sources in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, the proportion of energy produced by petrol declined gradually, whereas the rest sources of energy production increased slightly. Gas and petrol accounted for the biggest percentage of the total energy produced in France
In 1995, Coal’s production accounted for the highest proportion, at 29.80% of the total energy production in France. The rates of Gas and Petrol produced were slightly lower, at 29.63% and 29.27% respectively. Meanwhile, only 6.40% of the total production belonged to Nuclear energy.
In 2005, the percentage of Coal produced insignificantly went up and remained the highest figure in the chart, at 30.93%. The figure for Gas rose slowly to 30.31%, while Petro’s production experienced a dramatic fall of nearly 10% to only 19.55%. There were sharp increases in the figures for Nuclear and Other types of energy to 10.10% and 9.10% .
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-03 | Giang Tran | view |
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 73
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 78
- The graph below show the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus and train between 1970 and 2023 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Write at least 150 words 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the percentage of graduates that got full time jobs after graduating from a university in Australia and the average salary of both these types of graduates from 2004 to 2012 Summarise th 84