The two charts illustrate the findings of the research of the mature education on the information of people's studying purposes as well as people's opinion about the sharing in tuition fee for education.
Overall, the proportion of adults taking the course due to their interest in the subject is the highest whereas this percentage for the reason of meeting people is the lowest. The individuals' opinion that tuition fee for each course should be shared accounts for the largest.
From the first chart, It can be seen that the highest percentage with 40% of adults attending the course because of their keenness on the subject but only 9% of them enrolls the course for the purpose of meeting people. The objective of gaining qualifications ranks the second in the number of the growth- up. Improving prospects of promotion and enjoying learning/ studying are the two reasons with the same percentage of mature students' purposes of 20%. 22% of the adults think that the study is helpful for their current jobs and 12% of them considers studying for their ability to change jobs.
Turning to the second chart, the biggest proportion of adults has a thought that the tuition fee should be shared accounting for the highest at 40%. It is commonly believed that taxpayer and employers ought to have the least on the courses ‘s total costs with the proportion of 25% and 35% respectively
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 67
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 73
- The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK 78
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...on of meeting people is the lowest. The individuals opinion that tuition fee for each cours...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90212765957 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54944405838 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514893617021 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.986417447 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253931220999 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103986215311 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680802776336 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162170783092 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125838759878 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.