The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.
Write a report for a university lecturer, describing the information shown below
The given graphs illustrate adult's education purposes ordered by its popularity, along with the recommendation of how the courses 's fee should be shared. Overall, most adults are interested in educational activities because of their preference toward the subject, and individuals should be shared the largest part of the courses ’s fee.
The first chart point out that qualifications achievement and individual's interest are among the most common motivations for adult to pursue education, which take up 38% and 40% agreement respectively. In contrast, change of occupation and social communication are evaluated as the weakest desire, which account for only 12% and 9% respectively. Besides, job support, promotions and learning preferences are also considered as neutral inspiration, which take up around 20% agreement each.
The pie chart show that individuals should take up the largest proportion, about 40%, followed by employer with 35%. It is commonly believed that taxpayer ought to have the least on the courses ‘s total costs with the proportion of 25%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-01 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-01 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given graphs illustrate adults educa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... largest part of the courses ’s fee. The first chart point out that qualifica...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'qualifications'' or 'qualification's'?
Suggestion: qualifications'; qualification's
... The first chart point out that qualifications achievement and individuals interest ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h take up around 20% agreement each. The pie chart show that individuals shou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52121212121 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06395855992 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678787878788 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0895871685 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225769000373 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923335533075 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695023616768 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137338727771 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434725513845 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.