The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries

The given table illustrates the quality of life in terms of four criteria, including GNP per head, daily calorie supply per head, life expectancy at birth and infant mortality among 5 distinct nations.
Overall, it is obvious that the USA is the most developed countries with 4 positive examined indexes while the opposite was true for Bangladesh.
There are significant differences in the data of compared aspects among 5 countries. Each American citizen contributes to 13160 dollars to governmental budget, nearly 100 times as much as person in Bangladesh. According to the statistics, people in the USA also intake twofold the amount of calorie than that of Bangladesh consumers. While the average age and children death criteria in the former country are positive, at 74 years and 12 people, respectively, the figures for these aspects symbolizing prosperity in the latter region are negative, with 40 years and 132 people, respectively.
In terms of the 3 remaining subjects, consisting of Bolivia, Egypt and Indonesia, the gaps among criteria are relatively small. GDP per head indexes fluctuate around 550 to 700 dollars. Moreover, dwellers in 3 countries also consume a huge amount of food on a daily basis, the highest data is recorded in Egypt, with 2296 calorie for a day. The maximum gap among life expectancy aspect is 7 years between Egypt and Indonesia. Additionally, the birth mortality rates are high, with 124, 97 and 87 births per 1000 newborn children, respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'calorie' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'calories'.
Suggestion: calories
...st data is recorded in Egypt, with 2296 calorie for a day. The maximum gap among life e...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18257261411 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88651773633 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622406639004 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8118853811 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.545454545 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118408234293 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402115891712 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447202927308 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720795699171 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334806191947 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.