The given data shows student per lecture in practice-based and lecture-based subjects in King's college in UK.
The given representation highlights the information about the students of King's college in UK; who are attending lectures of subjects: related to science or other background in a distinct years: 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2005. The data is calibrated in per centum which is clearly and currently represented.
It can be seen that, first chart reveals the number of students per lecture during the period of 1997 to 2005. In year 1997, 15.4% people attended lectures and the number slightly increased upto 16.6% by year 1999. In addition to this, in year 2001, 2003, and 2005 the presence of student per lecture was 17.4%, 18.4%, and 19.6% respectively.
Secondly, in lecture-based subjects, students showed more interest in Chemistry with 16.4%, and after that, mathematics and then physics with only 11.6%. This report was came out in 2002.
Thirdly, in the same year statistical data for practice-based subjects was also being checked which assured little variations about the curiousness of children in history that was 13.2 percent. Furthermore, art and geography depicted similar results with minor difference of 0.2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-04 | Jashandeepkaur | 84 | view |
- It is said that adulterated food Is a reason behind Detriorated health of all age group masses. How far you agree or disagree? 61
- The flow chart shows the process of admission for admission into university 56
- The given data shows student per lecture in practice-based and lecture-based subjects in King's college in UK. 84
- The diagram show the stages and equipments used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes 84
- The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in US from 1950 to 2000.It also predicts the figures of 2025 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'year'?
Suggestion: year
...ience or other background in a distinct years: 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2005....
^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...hysics with only 11.6%. This report was came out in 2002. Thirdly, in the same y...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32777777778 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7856056371 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683333333333 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5321702814 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328082223806 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104901360256 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681868554709 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167786448763 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417883637963 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.