Given a line graph comparing the weekly consumption of three different categories of fast food in the UK over a 20 year period between 1970 to 1990.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there was an upward trend in the amount of both Hamburger and Fish and Chips consumption, whereas the category of Pizza saw a slight decrease in the amount consumed over the period in question.
Looking at the details, in 1970, the quantity of Pizza sold was highest, with over 300 grams per week, while the figures for two categories of Fish and Chips and Hamburger were lower, with around 300 and 400 grams respectively. In 1980, the amount of Pizza consumed hit a trough of about 200 grams, whilst the figures for other categories significantly increased.
In 1990, the Hamburger consumption experienced a dramatic rise to exactly 500 grams per week and became the highest figure compared to others. Meanwhile, Hamburger’s figure went up slightly to nearly 300 grams every week, and that for Pizza remained stable at roughly 200 grams per week, making its consumption lowest.
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 78
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because the computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 53
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television? 67
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97267759563 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69489227702 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6629998387 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270869742939 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143584609552 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140306617002 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182073611059 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153251907665 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.