The line graph gives information about how much people in America spent on mobile phone, domestic and worldwide fixed-line services over the period 9 years from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that while the amount of money spent on cell phone services increased significantly, the opposite trend was true for national fixed-line services, which went down sharply. It’s also noticable that fewer citizens in America used international fixed-line services than the other two during most of the period.
Looking at the chart in 2001, an everage of about $700 was charged for users of national landline phone, which was the highest data in 2001. however, the figures for cell phone services and worldwide landline services were only $200 and nearly $300 respectively at the same time. Over the next 5 years, the amount of spending on national fixed-line services decreased considerably by around $200. On the other hand, the evergae annual expenditure on cell phone services progressed remarkably at $500. In addition, the data of national landline services improved minimally, about $300 in 2006.
In 2006, the spending on cell phone and national landline services in America were similarly, at about $500 on each. There was a sharp rise to nearly $800 in the number of spending on cell phone services in the year 2010. In contrast, the figure for national fixed-line services declined moderately by around $100, by around $400 in the same time. Finally, the amount of spending on overseas landline services remained statically by the end of the period.
- The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France Spain Germany Turkey between 1970 and 2010 71
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 61
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... line graph gives information about how much people in America spent on mobile phone...
^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ne, which was the highest data in 2001. however, the figures for cell phone services an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, similarly, so, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07480314961 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67278764356 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488188976378 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1874925648 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.416666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286590548234 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129475191453 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597521354076 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212411827312 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413580026767 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.