The given line graph reveals the information regarding to the number of British people daily travelling using car, bus and train from 1970 to 2030.
The given line graph reveals the information regarding to the number of British people daily travelling using car, bus and train from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, it is noticiable that travelling by car escalated gradually from time to time. On the other hand, bus as well as train experienced an upwards and downwards.
As it illustrated by the graph that there were approximately more than 5 million cars used in 1970 and remained stable afterwards. In 1980, the number of cars rose moderately to 6 millions just before a boom happened in the following years and finally reached its highest point at 9 millions in 2030.
Meanwhile, buses and trains encountered an opposite trend. In 1970, the number of buses which were used by traveller were around 4 millions. Nevertheless, travelling by buses eventually decreased below 3 millions after six decades. Compeletely different to buses, Starting with steady number from 1970 to 1980 at the point of more than 2 millions, trains slowly increased between 1990 and 2000, then climbed to more than 5 million which was almost two times bigger than its starting point in 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly increased between 1990 and 2000, then climbed to more than 5 million which was...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, nevertheless, regarding, then, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99465240642 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72693717135 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620320855615 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1733016888 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453117393579 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198141768756 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.286170707113 0.0843802449381 339% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364914176214 0.15604864568 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.366669675394 0.0819641961636 447% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.