Thanks to the evolution of transportation, human lives nowadays have been improved significantly to the most convenient and liveable one than ever before. However, there is a controversial question that has been long discussed by citizens whether the government should make investments in improving railways or roads. From my point of view, I believe that the authorities should make efforts in order to meet the needs of both users.
On the one hand, there is no doubt about the benefits of trains since they were first invented. Trains have been used as a suitable and safe way to deliver products and passengers to different parts of a country. Japan could be concrete evidence for these facts. Regarded as one of the nations that have the most modern facilities for railways such as the Shinkanshen Subway, people hardly see traffic jams packed with private vehicles and trucks in Japan since those transportations have been replaced by trains and subways.
However, On the other hand, trains might not become the ideal means of transport when transferring things domestically, especially in some developing countries or the mountainous areas. Moreover, roads can directly reach any place you want, such as houses, shopping centres, and hospitals, whereas trains could only carry people from one station to another. Therefore, the users could be more independent on the desired destinations and did not have to walk far distances.
To conclude, it can be clearly seen that both roads and railways are complementary methods for convenient and easy travelling. I do recommend that the government set an organized plan to improve both means of transport.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Write a report 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22097378277 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88172494832 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63670411985 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5247957318 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102702421927 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347499335273 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349878454693 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641654809129 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343205345005 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.