The graph above shows the stock values of four technological companies between 2011 and 2016. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant.
The Graph illustrates the stock values of high-tech companies like Facebook, Google, Apple and Yahoo from 2011 to 2016.
It can be clearly seen that Facebook had increased its stock value every year ;while on the other hand, yahoo had decreased. Google had been successful to manage its consistency throughout the time period, Although yahoo had varied unpredictably year by year.
Initially Facebook had stock value around 7500 and by increasing regularly, it gained maximum value of about 20,000 in the year 2016. Yahoo had recorded as parallel as Facebook but in the inverse order with highest value of near about 2500 in 2016.
The stock value of apple was very close to 5000 in the beginning year 2011, however it gained stock value of near about 3500 in the very next year effectively, which was reported the highest among all the companies and throughout the entire time period.
By analyzing, All the inclusive data in the graph it can be concluded Google was the only association having repeatedly similar results around 1000 for the entire time period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-24 | mitp_patel | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...el as Facebook but in the inverse order with highest value of near about 2500 in 2016. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00561797753 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47974371617 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8435671939 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149922983275 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829005418518 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064437846186 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989908726449 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664493164713 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.