The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020.
The bar chart compares 4 types of vehicles in terms of their CO2 emission. The line graph shows the number of vehicles. Both diagrams refer to England and Wales in the period from 2000 to 2020.
Overall, the amount of CO2 emitted from cars, vans and trucks is expected to rise over time. Moreover, the line graph indicates an increase in the number of vehicles.
In 2000, cars emitted the most amount of CO2, 20 tons. The figures for vans and trucks were roughly the same, at 13 and 15 tons, respectively. By 2020, CO2 emissions from cars, vans and truck are expected to increase significantly. It is predicted that the figures for cars and trucks will rise by more than 5 tons, while the figure for vans will experience a smaller rise of 2 tons. In contrast to these increases, the figure for buses is expected to remained stable at 9 tons throughout the period.
The number of vehicles in 2000 was 20 million. The number rapidly increased to 40 million in 2010 and is expected to reach 55 million in 2020.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-28 | quanglnd31 | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | jahidhumayun@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 72
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55737704918 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43352911659 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535519125683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8534371147 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.5 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184491053565 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791681781653 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685079243717 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128155589059 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954587946843 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.