The information about the usage of water across the globe and the consumption of water in two various nations is depicted by rendered line chart and table. The data has been calibrated in km3 and m3.
To begin with, in 1990, the use of water in the Agriculture section was 500km3. A drastic increase was seen in the usage of water in Agriculture sector from 1900 to 2000, it was increased by 2500km3. While the use of water in Industrial and Domestic sector was almost similar between 1900 to 1940. However, there was a gradual increase observed in both sectors, it accounted for around 1200km3 and 500km3 respectively, in 2000.
Moving towards, 359m3 water was consumed by 176 million Brazilian, in 2000. In the Democratic Republic Of Congo, the number of people was 5.2 million. Although having 100km3 Irritated land they used 8m3 water in 2000.
To cap it call, it can be vividly manifested that the use of water in the Agriculture sector tops of that throughout the span.
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r in the Agriculture section was 500km3. A drastic increase was seen in the usage...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., the number of people was 5.2 million. Although having 100km3 Irritated land they used ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'calls'?
Suggestion: calls
...they used 8m3 water in 2000. To cap it call, it can be vividly manifested that the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97575757576 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93091560768 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6315592029 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216418132935 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902232388636 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832143652232 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140789990594 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568138488214 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.