The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph and table illustrates about utilisation of water globally in thrice sectors and it's consumption in couple of different nations.
To begin with, it is clear by analysing line graph that, during 1900, higher utilisation of water includes in agriculture sector (500 km3). However, other two sections started from similar count which was near to zero. Apart from that, in next two decades, usage of water in agriculture sector increased significantly upto 1500km3 in comparison to other couple of sectors as these were boosted with little count of 100km3. Yet, industrial sector used higher number during further twice years with 500km3. Whereas, usage of water for domestic purpose remained similar. Instead that, agriculture sector rapidly boosted their usage till 2000 year with 5000km3. On contrast, industrial was also gone upto 500km3. However, in last year, usage in domestic practices also lead towards higher count (400km3) respectively.
In addition, by analysing table, it is clear that, higher population rate is considered in Brazil (176 million) rather than in Democratic republic of Congo (5.2 million). Similarly, consumption of water for irrigation of land is on highest number in Brazil (26,500km3) rather than in other nation, Congo (100km3). Once again, there is huge difference in number of water consumption by per person where in Brazil 359km3 and in Congo 8km3 respectively.
Overall, in line graph, agriculture sector is on peak count during all eras. Moreover, in table, Brazil has maximum number in all sections of consumption of water.
- Today Tv channels broadcast men s sports shows more than women s sport shows Why is this case Should Tv channels give equal showtime for each 67
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015 61
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 67
- Today family members eat fewer meals together Why is this Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- The chart shows information about the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
... for domestic purpose remained similar. Instead that, agriculture sector rapidly booste...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, apart from, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34817813765 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66433060545 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550607287449 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2589200824 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3571428571 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210016455387 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787376096252 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802732528006 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161190613692 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810005547721 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.