The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The given line chart details the information about water use universally, while the table depicts the amount of water that is used in two distinctive regions including Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo.
Overview, it is obvious that a huge amount of water is utilized for agriculture sector as opposed to the remaining categories with minor water use. Meanwhile the greater population and vast land of Brazil is attached with higher water consumption than Democratic Republic of Congo.
Looking more closely at the pie chart, the amount of water used for agricultural purpose grew to varying degrees between 1900 and 2000. Its figure started at about 500 km3 in the first year, after which saw a rise to just over 1000 km3 after 50 years, the figure increased consistently and finally reach a peak at roughly 3000 km3 in 2000. Turning to the remaining sectors, its figure started the lower period with about 1 km3 for domestic use and 2 km3 for industrial use and stay unchanged until 1930. After that period, there was a considerable rise for two sectors with over 1000 km3 of water used for industry and about 200 km3 of water used for domestic.
According to the table, the water consumption of Brazil was significant with the figure being at 359 m3 due to its large population (176 million) and immense territory (26,500 km2). By contrast, with the smaller land (100 km2) and only 5,2 million people living in Democratic Republic of Congo, the amount of water consumed was recorded at lower period, at 8 m3.
- Some feel that individuals should have the right to strike in all jobs while others feel there are exceptions Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 67
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018 78
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85769230769 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54270915019 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534615384615 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.634178573 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 140.333333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255317422675 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128435606756 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880233327644 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188040343041 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873198369257 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.