The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries
the chart compares the amount of water consumed in global in 3 main sectors (Agriculture, Industrial use and domestic use) during the period between 1900 and 2000. In addition, the table illustrates water used by 2 country which are Brazil and Congo in the year 2000.
Overall, the amount of global water use significantly increases from 1900 to 2000, while Agriculture sector consumes the vast majority of water in the world and the amount of water used for Domestic sector takes up a small part of total water. It is also noticeable that water used per a person in Brazil is much higher than one in Democractic Republic of Congo in 2000.
In 1900, around 500 Km3 water used for irrigating, which was as a fifth as water consumed by domestic and industrial sector. From 1900 to 2000, there was a strongly increase in the amount of water use for agriculture to approximately 3000 km3. In the same rise trend but not much, Industry Sector and Domestics slightly rose demands for water to around 500 Km3 and around 1000 Km3 respectively.
In 2000, the Brazil's population was 176 million, while this was just 5.2 million in Congo. Moreover, Brazin had 26,500 Km2 land used for irrigation which is as 265 times as the other one in Congo. Around 359m3 was consumed by one person in Brazil, however, this figure in Congo is 8m3.
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produced electricity 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for many people why is this a case Do you think it is a negative or positive situation 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the chart compares the amount of water cons...
^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('strongly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...al sector. From 1900 to 2000, there was a strongly increase in the amount of water use for agricult...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68240343348 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52245893797 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515021459227 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6320982764 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215236739635 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108125479762 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816796021369 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155469597017 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871597896661 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.