THE GRAPH BELLOW SHOWS THE POPULATION FIGURES FOR DIFFERENT TYPE OF TURTLES IN INDIA FROM 1980 TO 2012
The graph line illustrates four types of turtle population figures in India for 32
years period, starting from 1980, by index (1980=100).
Overall, it is clear from the graph, that leatherback and green turtles, all species
and olive riddle turtles started at the same unit and fluctuated, experiencing
increase, drastic fall and steep changes.
All 4 types of turtle populations started at the same unit in 1980 and met each
other in the same point till 1996. In the mentioned year, the leatherback turtles
slightly increased up to 110 point of index and declined sharply after it. In 1998, it
met the green turtles in the 100 unit pattern and dramatically dropped till 55 in
2008, experiencing a slight increase till 60 point towards the end of the graph. In
contrast Olive Ridley turtles experienced a drastic leap, reaching to its peak of
140 point of index in 1997. After fluctuating it had a slight drop and most
strikingly, it kept the highest 130 pattern at the end of the graph.
Conversely, green turtles and all species fluctuated and met again in 1993 with
100 units respectively. The latter dropped relatively in 2003 to merely 85 point of
index and ended its result with 90 point of index in 2012. Meanwhile, all species
experiences a steep increase to 110 point of index towards the end of the graph.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | KayVu | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | GREgirl | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | jessie_12345 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | vdrobny | 87 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | buimai1412003 | view |
- Traditional Vs Modern housing 73
- Independnet 3
- line graph 56
- Nowdays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 82, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 60 point towards the end of the graph. In contrast Olive Ridley turtles experien...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...point towards the end of the graph. In contrast Olive Ridley turtles experienced a dras...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 37, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pattern' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'patterns'.
Suggestion: patterns
...st strikingly, it kept the highest 130 pattern at the end of the graph. Conversely, g...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89035087719 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64139616192 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0131223095 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 17.0 3.83414634146 443% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224234865622 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988775483731 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120970878518 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769230865753 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100378736128 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.