The graph shows the fluctuation of fertility in China and the USA during the period from 1992 to 2000. It is obvious that both nations had significant changes in the birth rate during that time, with lows in the 1940s and highs in the 1950s.
From approximately 10% in 1920, the birth rates in China fluctuated and reach 15% in 1935 and then decreased rapidly to 5% in the 1940s. After that period, the rates gradually increased and reach the peek of 20% in 1950, following by a period of decline.
There was a small change in the birth rates from 1920 to 1935 in the USA, from about 11% to 13% respectively. The birth rates then went down rapidly from 1935 and reach only 5% in 1945. Prior to 1950, the rates raise slowly and got the highest at 1950, which was 15%. The latter half century, the birth rates in the USA reduced to about 7% in 2000.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008 84
- A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 694.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3375 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1776922992 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 183.6 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2365552524 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.75 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215969289634 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105505618814 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539895057225 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152020845787 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321553845932 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.